Pendekatan Rule Of Reason Dan Per Se Illegal Dalam Perkara Persaingan Usaha
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v3i2.1688Keywords:
Business Competition, Per se Illegal, Rule of ReasonAbstract
Commission for Business Competition Supervision (Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha or KPPU) is an institution established to deal with issues related to business competition and monopoly practices. This article wants to describe the approaches to be taken by KPPU in dealing with the business competition cases. This research employed a normative research method with conceptual and case approaches. The result of research showed that there are two approaches to dealing with business competition case: rule of reason and per sel illegal. These two approaches can be selected alternatively, but they can also be used concomitantly. Rule of reason approach trials the substance of business action and its effect on community economy, while the per se illegal approach uses juridical positivistic approach. Keywords: Business Competition, Per se Illegal,  Rule of ReasonReferences
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Buku
Lubis, Andi Fahmi dan Ningrum Natasya Sirait (Edit.), 2009. Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Jakarta: KPPU.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, 2011. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group)
Pompe, Sebastian dkk. (Edit.). 2010. Ikhtisar Ketentuan Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Jakarta: The Indonesia Netherlands National Legal Reform.
Samadani, H. U. Adil, 2013. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Bisnis. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.
Silondae, Arus Akbar dan Wirawan B. Ilyas, 2011. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Bisnis Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Jurnal dan Tesis
Anggaraini, A. M. Tri. 2005. Penerapan Pendekatanâ€Rule of Reason†dan “Per Se Illegal†dalam Hukum Persaingan, dalam Persainagan dan Persekongkolan Tender. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 24(2).
Simbolon, Alum. 2013. Pendekatan yang dilakukan Komisi Persaingan Usaha Menentukan Pelanggaran dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 2(2).
Meryanti, Dewi. 2012. Praktek Monopoli dalam Industri Air Bersih di Pulau Batam di Tinjau dari Hukum Persaingan Usaha (Studi Kasus Perkara No. 11/KPPU-I/2008 Tentang Praktek Monopoli oleh PT. Adhy Tirta Batam), Tesis, Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.
Undang-Undang
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999.
Website
www.kppu.go.id, diakses tanggal 8 Agustus 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
AttributionYou must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
- Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal
========================================
Editor-in-Chief
Widya Yuridika: Journal of Law.
Faculty of Law, Universitas Widya Gama, Malang, Indonesia.